Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1535M v5 outperforms Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1535M v5 is 1443 days newer than Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-3960X - 124 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
113
91%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€239.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |