Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2626 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 239 vs 223 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1535M v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1535M v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Single-Core
1223
53.687445127304656%
Multi-Core
3828
49.45097532618525%
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
