Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3788 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 87 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 61% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 264 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |