Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 2388 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-965 - 203 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
485
37.62606671838635%
Multi-Core
1683
37.308800709377074%
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
| Broadwell | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
