Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1280 - 208 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12479 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |