Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3663 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1280 - 209 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €64.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |