Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v3 is 399 days newer than Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770 - 169 vs 156 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 77 vs 82 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
156
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |