Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1965 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 174 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 65 vs 82 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €108.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13835 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |