Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3513 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 195 vs 173 FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 65 vs 82 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€178.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €178.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |