Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2844 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 40% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 130 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €125.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |