Buy on Amazon
€79.14
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2524 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10400F (Base Clock: 2.90 GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1275 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-10400F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.