Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3691 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1270 - 211 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1270
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
