Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 38% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 279 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |