Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2269 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 192 vs 185 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |