Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1730 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 428 vs 410 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
428
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€728.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €728.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |