Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1498 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 136 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 48 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1055.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,055.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |