Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1357 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 208 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |