Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2430 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 173 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 15 vs 45 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |