Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Xeon E3-1260L - 178 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 24 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€304.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €304.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |