Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2208 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 258 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €243.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |