Buy on Amazon
€666.67
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 24% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E3-1240 - 342 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
342
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€666.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €666.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
