Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 2507 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1240 - 522 vs 507 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
522
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |