Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 3003 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 241 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Single-Core
1310
46.75231977159172%
Multi-Core
4192
25.381448292564784%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
