Buy on Amazon
€172.05
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $282
Availability
MSRP in USD: $282
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Minecraft than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 729 vs 696 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
729
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€172.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €172.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.