Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 442 days older than Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-7400T - 126 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 35 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |