Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1498 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 9% better in New World than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€394.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €394.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Single-Core
1310
76.87793427230048%
Multi-Core
4192
39.19222139117427%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |