Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 3847 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 151 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 22 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1154
48.06330695543524%
Multi-Core
3735
32.523510971786834%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 22 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
