Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3511 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 348 vs 307 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
348
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€466.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €466.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57678 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1154
37.165861513687595%
Multi-Core
3735
17.10713140658636%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |