Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2367 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 80 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 11% better in New World than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 121 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 48 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€973.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €973.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |