Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 14% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 167 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€450.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €450.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
69 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |