Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 254 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
