Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1230 - 560 vs 508 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
560
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
588
27.084292952556428%
Multi-Core
1975
21.53527423399847%
Intel Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |