Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 36% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1225 - 125 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66851 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
568
23.956136651202026%
Multi-Core
1693
15.464011691633175%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |