Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1551 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1225 - 175 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 91 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |