Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v5 is 1357 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 3 3200G - 527 vs 522 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
522
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€62.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €62.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |