Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1551 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |