Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1094 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 80 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1109
88.5782747603834%
Multi-Core
3188
44.787861758921046%
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |