Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v3 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v3 is 461 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6200 - 522 vs 439 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
