Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E-2336 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2336.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 14% better in Starfield than Xeon E-2336 - 79 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2336 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E-2336 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€259.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €259.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 719 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2336 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |