Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon E-2314 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 483 days newer than Xeon E-2314.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E-2314 - 193 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2314 - 8 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2314
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Single-Core
1684
73.9244951712028%
Multi-Core
4241
54.78620333290273%
Intel Xeon E-2314 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
