Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1316 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E-2276M - 132 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 32 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€353.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13613 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |