Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E-2186G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 402 days newer than Xeon E-2186G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2186G
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E-2186G - 112 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2186G - 24 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€304.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €304.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58383 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 31st, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 31st, 2018
Single-Core
1485
87.71411695215593%
Multi-Core
6255
62.940229422419%
Intel Xeon E-2186G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |