Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 1948 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Celeron G1610 - 174 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
93.10344827586206%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
30.75812274368231%
Multi-Core
739
14.962543024903827%
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |