Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2144G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2144G is 1403 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2144G
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 133 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 71 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E-2144G
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
61.77451634422949%
Multi-Core
3996
84.33938370620515%
Intel Xeon E-2144G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
71 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
