Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E-2136 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 1154 days newer than Xeon E-2136.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E-2136 - 149 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E-2136
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Xeon E |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
