Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2136 outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2136 is 658 days older than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i5-10400F - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
98.88888888888889%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €80.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
92.65463917525774%
Multi-Core
5751
90.21176470588236%
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |