Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1394 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 9% better in Far Cry 5 than Pentium P6200 - 196 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 4 vs 2 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Pentium P6200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium P6200
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
