Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 758 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Pentium P6100 - 176 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 8 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |