Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G5400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1302 days older than Pentium Gold G5400T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Pentium Gold G5400T - 229 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
225
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |