Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400T is 1 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Celeron G4900 - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Pentium Gold G5400T - $17.05 vs $43.84
- Up to 59% better value when playing God of War than Pentium Gold G5400T - $0.12 vs $0.29 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
41%
Price, €
€48.66
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €48.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
164
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |